OctoberBaby

OctoberBaby

Friday, August 13, 2010

Total Idiots! ABA,APA and Judge Vaughn Walker.





Judge Vaughn Walker ruling is evidence that the homosexuals lives in a disguised condition as an 'adult' psychologically speaking. He declares that marriage is a matter for the State to decide but fails to explain why it has been the condition of one man and one woman for centuries. Why then is polygamy not allowed? The underpinning of state laws or as Pope Leo XIII has stated the 'ordinance of reason' has already drawn its value from Judeo-Christian laws, which is why there are references to God in almost every courtroom in America to this day and even printed on the currency which gives to God or to some super natural entity acting as such the trust of negotiating our fiduciary and economic affairs.

The religions of people, nor their moral values and thus their moral reasoning cannot be expunged on the will and whim of secularists. Who reason towards his personal comfort and satisfactions, who solves for comfort rather than the truth. The supernatural and metaphysical benevolence under the providence of almighty God cannot merely be ignored into dissolution any more than a river dries up simply because there is no one there to watch it flow. To reason thusly is nothing less than the very evidence of a Piagetean psychological immaturity.

Judge Walkers ruling was based on the plaintiff's contention that the Due Process Clause was violated which states that no "State [shall] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." U.S. Const Amend XIV. The plaintiffs claim that the freedom to marry the person of one's choice is a fundamental right protected by the Due Process Clause and the Proposition 8 violates this fundamental right because:


  1. It prevents each plaintiff from marrying the person of his or her choice.

  2. The choice of a marriage partner is sheltered by the Fourteenth Amendment from the State's unwarranted usurpation of that choice; and

  3. California's provision of a domestic partnership --a status giving same -sex couples the rights and responsibilities of marriage without providing marriage--does not afford plaintiff's an adequate substitute for person of their choice, invidiously discriminates, without justification, against plaintiff's and others who seek to marry a person of the same sex.

The plaintiff's claim of violation of the Equal Protection Clause which states that no State shall "deny to any person within it's jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws" U.S. Const Amend XVI fall under two charges.



  1. There is discrimination against gay men and lesbians by denying them a right to marry the person of their choice whereas heterosexual men and women may do so freely; and

  2. Proposition 8 disadvantages a suspect class in preventing only gay men and lesbians, not heterosexuals, from marrying.

There is no violation of the Due Process Clause. No one is after Due Process prevented from marrying the person of their choice however, restrictions are in place to prevent maldeveloped persons or the imposition of individuals who wish to cast an absurdity upon the State. Such cases of the former include the ineligibility of close relatives from marrying because of the burden placed on the state for their care and reduction of eligible candidates for it's sustenance and affairs the state should be disinclined to produce unhealthy off spring. Where the probability of healthy offspring falls below fifty percent the marriage can not be granted by the State. As far as homosexual 'marriages' the probability of healthy offspring is absolutely zero and therefore does not meet State requirements, not for the production or probability of healthy offspring but for the improbability of healthy offspring as would be the case if a man married a goat, which constitutes the latter exception, casting an absurdity upon the State. Thus it is not a permissible legal union as production and development is a fundamental interest of any State although not a mandate of marriage, the State constitutes the population of human beings and has a vested interest in seeing to it that the healthiest human beings are brought forth. More so it must be understood that a rule is not subject to it's exceptions and hypotheticals. Elderly and sterile couples in a heterosexual union still meet the criteria of having the universal potential for procreation as have been born out from the power of God, to Abraham and his wife Sarah who was beyond her years. Barren women such as Hannah and Rebecca in the Bible to whom God has granted a child may have been sterile but through a miracle granted by God were able to produce. Miracles do happen and need to be accredit amongst the exceptions and hypotheticals as well. Although belief in Christianity or Judaism or the Bible is not necessary for understanding this principal, so far as exceptions and hypotheticals are included in the debate these will also suffice for the purpose. It is also worth mentioning that although it is not beyond God's power as described in the Bible (a sacred text which happens to be the most widely published book in human history as well as the first in publication) He would most likely not look favorably on a gay union and subsequently that pair would have little hope.


As far as the Fourteenth Amendment sheltering the States unwarranted usurpation of that marriage it seems fitting that an amendment that was put in place for the protection of disadvantaged African American former slaves and manipulated for profit by greedy merchants to defend their universal or realist corporate bodies by identifying them as persons although they be 'hollow' would be used by this group of plaintiffs. Marriages or as it is known in corporate vernacular merges and acquisitions are scrutinized to make sure that there is no anti-trust violations in order to prevent unfair competition and stifled innovation. So this line of reasoning that discrimination is not applied when it comes to granting unions is false. Thirdly, the States allowance of domestic partnership does not in any way appear to impede on the legal rights of the plaintiffs. The courts cannot redress the issue of social standing or social status, legally the status of domestic partnerships and married couples are equal under the law in the state of California already.


Finally, the courts ought to have found that Proposition 8 does not discriminate against homosexuals in deference to heterosexuals because under the Proposition neither homosexuals or heterosexuals can marry the same sex, subsequently there is no discrimination, all are treated equally.


African American experience, their trials and tribulations in this great country of ours have been tokenized at will by the homosexuals to prove their case. They repeatedly site miscegenation laws that prevent African Americans from marrying Anglo Americans and they recount that when AA where slaves they were considered property and where no allowed to marry. I would like to cite some other tokenism from the AA experience which are apparently missed on the homosexual community . For instance the Jim Crow era like court room in which this case was held, Judge Vaughn Walkeer is reported to be gay himself, having a homosexual Judge who would directly benefit from his own ruling makes his ruling inadmissible. It was akin to the AA man being accused of raping a white woman and having a horse come in and serve as an eye witness, having the horse stomp once for yes and two for no on the courtroom floor. Secondly this idea that the homosexuals have that their marriages would in no way effect the lives of heterosexuals is only indicative of their psychotic illness. It is they that live by the idea that we, an integrated society, are not effected by the actions, lifestyles and behaviors of our neighbors and fellow citizens, this is not true. In this respect they hearken to a separate but equal doctrine which in itself was considered unconstitutional in Brown vs. The Board of Education but they over look this fact.


The evidence makes bare the fact that homosexuality itself is little more than a psychiatric illness. What is more, it only goes to prove how dependant man is on God to reason correctly. Homosexuals are psychotically ill and need to be barred from pivotal positions such as judges. Further the APA (American Psychiatric Association) needs to be sued for abandoning their patients for the whimsical elopement with an unproven theoretical frame work of adaptation rather than the proven psychoanalytic framework by which most of the diagnostic criteria was originally established. Their claim that if 'distress, disability or disadvantage' is not readily observable that person does not have a disorder is fallacious in light of serial killers and sociopaths who do not have dystonic personalities chiefly because they are unconscionable. In fact those disordered people who are 'disturbed' with their maladaptive or abusive behaviors and show it are demonstrating their humanity are in 'jihad' with their negative thoughts and impulses and deserve to be respected for at least being aware that the way they feel and behave is inappropriate. They should not be singled out as 'the crazy ones' while the others roam about blithely undaunted by public opinion and have no fear of God.


http://www.scribd.com/doc/35374462/California-Prop-8-Ruling-Augusst-2010


Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media:NY Times Works Hand in Glove with New World Order Masters To Legitimize Homosexuality

Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media

Noam Chomsky has been proven right again when he pointed out in the 1980’s that the NY Times was complicit in helping to shape public opinion for the American elitist who want to mold this New World Order. His analysis as presented in his book co-authored with Edward S. Herman Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media Pantheon Books 1988, of the behavior of the NY Times then is consistent with their method of dealing with the Church Sex scandal of 2010. Apparently the necessity found by the Times and their allies to dethrone the Church as a moral authority by the publishing the legal cases currently being taken up in court by attorney Jeff Anderson plays a role in how the elitist of the new global society believe the world should operate under them. In this New World Order there is no place for the Church so it had to be neutralized through attempted moral and financial bankruptcy. Yet as Chomsky so effortlessly demonstrated when in 1975 the Khmer Rogue merciless committed atrocities against their people by killing them in the hundreds of thousands the Times only picked up on it when it could be documented as a Communist act of aggression. However, when an equal act of aggression against the people of East Timor was being carried out by American sponsored Indonesian forces the story was so effectively buried and under reported that Chomsky openly declared the American media and the NY Times itself complicit in the genocide, a tremendous charge.

Homosexuality fits into the schema of the New World Order so seamlessly that it has been declassified as a psychiatric disorder altogether. That would mean that the American Psychiatric Society was either wrong twenty years ago or they are wrong now, or as it seems, simply marginalized as have Professor Kenneth Howard of Illinois State University http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/jul/10071907.html and biology professor, June Sheldon of San Jose/Evergreen community college who just won a $100,000 settlement for being fired after her comments on homosexuality was reported as offensive by one of her students. Calif. Professor Fired for Homosexual Comments Wins $100K Settlement.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

All Muslims Are Called To Be Jihadist

According to Faisal Shahzad all Muslims are called on to be Jihadist. Perhaps his strident extrinsic interpretation of this belief is incorrect and certainly he is no more an authority on Islam any more than John Hagee is on Christianity (He calls Catholicism the "whore of Babylon" a Cathari belief established during the 12th Century subject to the Medieval Inquisition and crusade known to Catholics as the Albigensian Heresy). However, it interesting to note that this was the young man to whom many people in New York thought to be a 'nice guy'. All the while he was convinced that they were only worthy of death if they did not convert to Islam and that only Allah was to be worshiped.

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Obama blasted, 13 nations cited on religious freedom - USATODAY.com

Obama white shirt open mouth Obama has proven that he is a man that detest religious freedom or at least that he is against the Catholic Church exclusively as he has changed the long standing American 1st Amendment interpretation of religious freedom to “freedom to worship”. What this means is that he will no longer defend the right for people to have their own religious beliefs in terms of education and public display of religious belief but instead that one ought merely has the right to pray inside their parish, synagogue or mosque.

Obama muslimeYet at the same time he has pledged to help fight and defend Muslim intolerance any where in the world but has not pledged to do the same for other religions.

Obama blasted, 13 nations cited on religious freedom - USATODAY.com

United States Commission on International Religious Freedoms

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/july/2.12.html

Friday, June 25, 2010

Baptist Press - Evangelicals frustrated by Obama's 'Gay Pride' decree - News with a Christian Perspective

2346 President Barrack Hussein Obama has declared June officially the “Gay Pride” month for Lesbian, Bisexual, Gay and Transsexuals community. This coming from the President who had a his own previous Baptist minister condemn the United States to hell, contrary to the teachings of Christ.


At heart here in America is the reality that the separation of Church and State is a devise to not create two “separate and equal” groups but rather to do away with God altogether. They are in fact usurping God as the Bible has stated. This faction of Americas talk about God but they do not adhere to the tenants of Judaism, Christianity or Islam. It is not clear that they adhere to any religious belief. All of this comes from the President, a Harvard graduate who stated that he was not going to place “obscure references” to homosexuality over the teachings of Jesus Christ. In this he is refereeing to St. Paul’s epistle to the Romans, Chapter 1 verse 18-32.


“18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and injustice of those men that detain the truth of God in injustice: 19 Because that which is known of God is manifest in them. For God hath manifested it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made; his eternal power also, and divinity: so that they are inexcusable.


21 Because that, when they knew God, they have not glorified him as God, or given thanks; but became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 For professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. 23 And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of a corruptible man, and of birds, and of fourfooted beasts, and of creeping things. 24 Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonour their own bodies among themselves. 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.


26 For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. 27 And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. 28 And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, 30 Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,


26 "God delivered them up"... Not by being author of their sins, but by withdrawing his grace, and so permitting them, in punishment of their pride, to fall into those shameful sins.


31 Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. 32 Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them. “


What the Baptist Churches are asserting quite truthfully here is the President’s and that of the LGBT people of the total defiance of God which is the actual reason for pushing God out of the public square. They manage to discuss “injustices” while committing injustice against the American people by mangling normal human relationship as consecrated by God. God cannot be pushed out of the public square for the fact that He is the exact object of rejection. We the people to which the LGBT community believes need educational reform in order to see things as they would choose but the heterosexuals, even those who oppose sexual deviance, are not their problem. Their true enemy is God Himself, it is not man that they defy but God. (1st Romans 12:19)


John 7:7 found 2
”The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth: because I give testimony of it, that the works thereof are evil.”


Often the LGBT community and their supporters talk about love as the true test of their values and yet even the dismissed Catholic Bishop Ugandan Bishop Christopher Senyonjo who was denied his pension by the Catholic Church for his support of LGBT community in Uganda where sexual deviance is still illegal says in a pro LGBT conference sponsored by Center For American Progress stress that his determination of what is a valid relationship is not the scripture of God but whether there is love in the relationship. He shared the stage with Episcopal Bishop Gene Bishop Robinson of New 200px-Bishop_Gene_Robinson_portrait_2005 Hampshire. Michal Posner assistant secretary of United States opened the discussing affirming Americas or rather the State Departments interest in promoting Human Rights in to that end protection for LGBT. Ironically he does not do anything for Catholics and Christians who are under such torturous situations as well. President Barrack Hussein Obama and Secratary of State Hiliary Clinton are the protaganist who support the entire gay agenda and yet Barrack Hussein Obama said that he was a Christian. What Christian would support the homosexuals to this extent. He is changing the language of the law on religious freedom to freedom to worship so that Catholocism and all of Christianity will be outlawed. These people have to be voted out of office asl soon as possible because they do not respect religious freedom in the least. President B.H.O is trying to take God out of the public square and sequester He and His Holy Word from the minds of millions. When B.H.O first came to office it was very much a matter of him following an idelogy that was quite liberal, he has succeeded in doing that but he has also not removed the troops as he said he would from Iraq and he has sided with big pharmactical compies and big drug companies. He appears to be a two-faced type of politician even taking the big insurance companies to task after agreeing to deal with them making them appear to be the enemey.



Baptist Press - Evangelicals frustrated by Obama's 'Gay Pride' decree - News with a Christian Perspective

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Hillary Clinton in Lima Pushes Abortion, Gay Agenda - International - Catholic Online

Hillary C big smileThere were rumors on Wall Street that Hillary Clinton was a lesbian. There was much talk of this after her husband’s debacle with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. The general talk was that she didn’t take care of her man at home so poor Bill had to satisfy his needs outside the marriage. It was assumed that this is how their marriage worked, they were more of a “power couple” rather than loving couple. Unfortunately men are notorious liars when it comes to women. They devise all manner of calumny as a psychosexual defense against women to thrawt their ability to accumulate power over them, sexually as well as politically. In fact this behavior has been documented long ago in merry ol’ England when men walked about with cod pieces in their pants (stockings?) or in eighteenth century Russia when Catherine the Great was rumored to be a hedonist who had a voracious sexual appetite (for men) which other state leaders manipulated in rumor to whittle away at her basic dignity as Empress. Sex and politics one would think would make for strange bed fellows. Sex and the Catholic Church would make strange bed fellows as well and yet only the naive would believe that the two are never entwined. Different demographics take turns scandalizing and evangelizing the moral depravity of the others sexual predilections. However the homosexuals have started a political movement to redraw the very social schema of human relations. Which is the reason why all of a sudden those calumnious rumors concerning the now Secretary of State don’t seem so incredible anymore, that and Hillary’s big push for the queer agenda. Of course her boss President Barrack Hussein Obama pushes hard for the queers. Obama is a servant of the queers.They yelled at him to hurry up on their gay agenda like he was a step-N-fetch it servant in fifteenth century France, not even waitresses are spoken to in such a manner these days.

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan’s a queer, at least many people harborimages a lurking suspicion concerning her sexuality. She looks like a dyke, all damned up or whatever the term “dyke” refers. The queers are a danger to this democracy. Queers are subversives like feminists (also queers) and communists (makes no difference). There should be McCarthy-like hearings where people have to testify before a Congressional committee as to whether they are in fact a queer or a queer sympathizer. “Are you now or have you ever been a queeeeeer!” in the best affected Boston accent one can muster. It could be on C-span, in fact it might very well be on C-span at this moment as far as the number of people actually watching C-span is concerned or for that matter the actual difference an informed democracy has on the outcome of ones political ambitions.

There is a queer agenda in America, the queers want to take over and dominate heterosexuals till we are all hapless breeding "monkeys” who believe everything they write and take them to be gods, so they are eager to take these top spots. These truths are also held to be self-evident.

Homosexuals push on every front to ratify into human consciousness a lie, that their behavior is “normal” and acceptable when in fact it is a psychiatric illness. Homosexuals are psychotic, one would have to be in light of the fact that one man puts his penis in the anus of another man and pretends that this is the same as coitus with a woman. However, the great evil of homosexuals is their perpetuation of this lie and their attempt to have everyone accept this lie as something true. Now they want to adopt children but if they truly loved children they would want the best for them and that would include providing a sane, stable home with two natural parents at best or as an adopting couple giving them the minimal grace of having both a mother and a father. This is also true of divorce. If one purchased a pair of shoes and got home to find that there was only one shoe in the box, how do you think that person would feel? Exactly, they would feel cheated, they would feel angry and hurt. Which is exactly how the children of divorce parents feel. It is as much a treachery to ones generation to divorce as it is to be homosexual and still try to adopt. To be homosexual is to opt out of the emotional responsibility of both having a loving partner and loving children.

Raising children that are not your own is not the same as raising those you had naturally. There surely will be lots of sentimental rebuffs of this notion but that would not make it any less true. There is an inherent sense of responsibility that courses both down to posterity and up towards ones linage. Queers have already made the decision that no ol' ball and chain will drag them back down to the convoluted plains of emotional reality and neither will the weight of being responsible for children who, when naturally born through a married couple obliges as well as inspires the pair to put aside childish things of their own and take actions on behalf of the child. Chief amongst this responsibility is to provide them with a world that has a basic psychiatric structural integrity by which all men, once they become men, can rely. Homosexuals instead have already made the decision to be beholden to no one, not God, not to secular convention and customary tradition nor to their families. It is ridiculous to abandon ones own hereditary line as homosexuals do only to rush out and adopt someone else’s child. Anyone who can abandon their own family in that manner can never be an honest and loving parent. Albeit, most parents are not “all loving” however they are the natural parent and have shown some modicum of decency in how they raised their children by quite simply… well, raising them decently. The same can not be said of those who abort their living responsibility and inheritance in the womb or enters into divorce proceedings leaving their own child to dangle in insecurity or wallows in psychological immaturity unwilling to put away their own post modern romp through a world cast in their own image, a world with no absolute truth. One will admit, President Barrack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are good parents from what any stranger can discern. However, they are bad parents and poor leaders for their crusade to attempt to legitimize what is ersatz, namely homosexuality. God Bless America.

Hillary Clinton in Lima Pushes Abortion, Gay Agenda - International - Catholic Online

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

YouTube - Arizona State Senator Johnson brings 9/11 Truth to Senate p1

YouTube - Arizona State Senator Johnson brings 9/11 Truth to Senate p1

We have not trusted the government since the Twin Towers collapsed. Now with Barrack Obama making back room deals with the pharmacutial companies and the Insurance companies and now as likely with British Petroleum we have no reason to. It has been ten years of war and now that they have found the rich minerals that they are looking for in Afghanastan it might be even longer. Where is Governor Ventura's television show did he step on the toes of one too many Bilderburgs? Renew your inquiries into the the World Trade Tower bombings and you will discover that the New World Order wants you dead.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

What Is Wrong With Obama's Health Policy

One of the primary flaws with President Obamas new Health Care Law is that it did not take into account the people in this country who already have health care and would rather be treated outside of the American Medical Associations clinical medicine model. Will this new law force my new insurance provider to pay for my traditional African cleansing ceremonies and cowrie shell readings?

There is no such thing as universal care outside the loving arms of God. Even earlier to this law many Americans migrated out of the clinical health care model of the AMA and began investing their time and money in the holistic health care sector. This is done out of experience with the clinical model and with the holistic approach which served them better. The concern that this will lead to a medical school hegemony is genuine if a bit phobic.

The irony of an African American president bringing this issue to the people can not be overlooked. For thousands of years Africans did not have this medical care but yet to this day many African Americans are here before us giving a testimony to a health care practices that however meager in comparative scientific terms served its purpose. An African American woman of fifty five years of age wakes at three in the morning to go to work four days a week working ten hour days. This woman smokes tobacco and other natural products everyday, both her parents are alive she has two healthy children now self sustaining adults. Comparatively, using myself as a baseline, a man forty years of age who would struggle to keep that schedule, lost both parents and two brother by age thirty eight through natural causes, riddled with illness starting with A for asthma and a litany of other health issues that can be listed alphabetically down to perhaps P. It seems only natural that one would seek out African inspired medical practices does it not? If in fact the Africans are dare we say genetically superior to have sustained on earth longer than any other man certainly there is a wisdom in seeking medical treatment carried down through the generations by them.

Although that comparison above is not an average, inductively there are probably many more cases similar to it. African Americans have never had the best health care system catering to them even though they resided here in America but they somehow manage to dominate the athletic arenas, how is that possible? Here again, most would clamor to genetics to settle the case and they would be correct to some degree but what can be said of the African Americans can be said of other people like the Chinese who dominate fields in their own right, are genetically dissimilar to African Americans but did not avail themselves of American medicine for millenniums either, exactly how badly do we need this particular brand of health care and more importantly do we all want it and if not why must we all pay for it? Contrarily, only in the last ten years or so has acupuncture, an ancient Chinese medical practice become an acceptable form of treatment in the United States and many professional women between the age of twenty two to twenty eight are practicing yoga as a response to stress which most likely was not a regime prescribed by their general practitioner.

Compounding these anomalous realities in the face of empirical science the average American doctor knows little about his patients diets, what it is they eat, they seldom even ask. Yet holistic stragetists like naturopathic (a word I had to add to the dictionary of this software) physicians Dr. James D'Adamo and Dr. Peter D'Adamo, father and son respectively have set successful courses through the monitoring of nutrition to which I owe my life but for some reason are not suggested or integrated into the AMA clinical model and subsequently many like myself have become philosophical refugees living behind the clinical model for holistic approaches, yet I have heard no discussion on this reality from President Obama.

Further our philosophical differences will set us apart on who we would like to treat us, in the end it has to be remembered that the patient seeks out the doctor and yes I would much rather like to see the Chinese model carried out where the doctor seek out the patient and seek to maximize their present health but only if I am being sought out and treated by a natruopathologist. However, in the American Medical Association a majority of the doctors probably share a perception of mankind shaped more by Clarence Day then Jesus Christ who was Himself a Doctor. To this end I refuse to accept medical treatment from any one who perceives man to be an animal, I am a human being, I require human care.

From the Tuskegee experiments to the eugenics movement which began in American not Germany, African Americans came out on the losing end of medicine in the United States and summarily are weary of it evinced by the low rate of doctor visits taken by African American men statistically. Although this may not be the only cause or a preponderance of the reality it is certainly a legitimate claim, not by any means a hollow one.